Pakistan had initially refused to play India in solidarity with Bangladesh, which was removed from the tournament after opting out of matches in India due to security concerns. The PCB framed its stance as a protest against what it described as “double standards” by the ICC.
Diplomatic efforts involving the ICC, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, the UAE, and the Pakistan government aimed to ensure the high-profile India-Pakistan match went ahead, given its commercial and sporting significance.
Speaking to reporters before the boycott was lifted, Naqvi said, “Hamne apne liye kuch nahi kiya,” emphasizing that Pakistan had not sought any concessions for itself. He credited Bangladesh Cricket Board president Aminul Islam for requesting Pakistan’s participation after Bangladesh’s concerns were resolved through ICC-mediated discussions.
However, reports emerged earlier suggesting that Pakistan had indeed raised additional demands during meetings with ICC officials, including the resumption of bilateral cricket with India and a proposed tri-series involving India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh—both of which the ICC rejected as beyond its jurisdiction.
Naqvi is also believed to have brought up the Asia Cup trophy incident with ICC vice-chairman Imran Khwaja. The issue dates back to September, when India refused to hand over the trophy to Naqvi due to his dual role as Pakistan’s Interior Minister amid heightened political tensions. Naqvi reportedly questioned whether the ICC would have remained silent if Pakistan had refused a trophy from an Indian official.
The ICC later confirmed that Bangladesh would face no penalties for its withdrawal and awarded the BCB additional hosting rights in the 2028–2031 cycle. Following this, Bangladesh formally thanked Pakistan for its support and requested the PCB to participate in the February 15 fixture. Soon after, the Pakistan government directed the national team to take the field, citing appeals from “friendly countries” and the importance of preserving the spirit of cricket.
